What the review says
- Off-topic complaints
- Restricted content
- Promotional material
Read off the page. Where most straightforward policy reports begin.
Negative Review Removal
Filed on its own, a review like that survives every case you open. Read against the buyer accounts behind it, it often stops being one shopper’s opinion.
We file good-faith cases against policy violations and supported abuse patterns. Legitimate negative opinion is not targeted. Read our standard for review removal without review suppression.
Why This Exists
You opened a case. You quoted the rule. Somebody replied in under a minute and the review is still sitting on your page.
We have reviewed the content you reported and determined that it does not violate our guidelines.
The reply most sellers get, on most cases, most of the time.
We file conventional content cases when the review itself supplies the evidence. When the text survives that review, we look for a supported account pattern instead of repeating the same unsupported report.
That work is most of what we do, and it is how we know where it stops working. Once a review is written well enough to survive a read, the answer is different evidence entirely.
Read off the page. Where most straightforward policy reports begin.
Only in the buyer data. None of it lives in the review, which is why filing case by case never reaches it.
Aletheia
Dragging into the open what was built to stay hidden. One review tells you almost nothing about who wrote it. The same account measured against the wider buyer graph tells you what else it bought, whose listings it keeps landing on, and who it keeps arriving with.
12 outer accounts cleared · no shared history
Every lit connection is shared purchase history between two reviewer accounts. Hover or tap an account, here or in the graph, to trace its correlations.
| Acct | Linked | Brands | Window |
|---|---|---|---|
| 01 | 6 | 3 | 9 days |
| 02 | 6 | 3 | 9 days |
| 03 | 5 | 2 | 7 days |
| 04 | 6 | 3 | 4 days |
| 05 | 4 | 2 | 9 days |
| 06 | 6 | 3 | 2 days |
| 07 | 5 | 3 | 6 days |
Linked: cluster accounts it shares purchase history with · Brands: unrelated brands reviewed · Window: first arrival to last
Amazon holds signals we will never see. Our job is to assemble the part it cannot easily put together on its own, in a form its teams can act on: the accounts, the overlaps, the timing, and the connections back to whoever benefits. See how we separate content evidence from buyer-network evidence.
No ring, no removal.When the data does not support a network finding, we say not proven and file the conventional case instead. We do not accuse accounts we cannot evidence.
What Comes Down
Some are read off the review. 7 exist only in the account data behind it. None of them is a promise, because Amazon makes the final decision on every case it receives. Review what Amazon review removal actually covers.
Complaints about the order, the box, the seller, or Amazon itself. Not the product, so not a valid review.
Content Amazon bars outright, at any star rating.
Reviews doing marketing work for someone, or steering buyers somewhere else.
None of these appear in the review text. They surface in the buyer graph, where Aletheia works.
What You Get Back
Star rating is the one everyone counts, and it matters. It is not the only thing moving.
A confirmed removal changes the review population Amazon uses for the displayed rating. The exact effect depends on the rating removed and the total review count.
Policy-violating or abusive content no longer appears beside legitimate product experiences after Amazon confirms removal.
Each filing is tied to a stated condition and supporting evidence, creating a cleaner record than repeated unsupported reports.
Content evidence and behavioral evidence stay separate, so each report explains what can be seen and what the wider account pattern adds.
Authentic product criticism is left alone. Work is limited to good-faith reports of content violations or supported abuse patterns.
When the data supports it, connected buyer activity is documented as a pattern rather than reduced to isolated review text.
How the Engagement Works
Every case stays tied to evidence, Amazon policy, and a documented outcome. Unsupported accusations do not enter the workflow.
You identify the US marketplace products to include. We verify the written-review minimum before accepting the engagement.
We review written content and map buyer-account relationships through Aletheia. Unsupported conclusions are marked not proven.
We prepare evidence-based reports through the appropriate Amazon channels and track each submitted case.
You are invoiced weekly only for removals Amazon confirms. Amazon controls every final decision.
Requirement
A hard floor, held strictly. Below it we are not the right fit and we will tell you so rather than book a call.
One, two, and three star reviews that contain written text, totalled across the products you select. Not your lifetime review count and not your rating.
A rating without text has no review page, no reviewer profile, and nothing to file against. There is no case to build, which is why star-only ratings cannot be filed on at all. The floor also exists because network analysis gets stronger with volume, and below it the graph has too little to work with to be worth either side’s time.
Performance-Based Pricing
Frequently Asked Questions
$200 per confirmed removal. MajestIQ invoices weekly for confirmed removals and you pay through the invoice link. There is no card on file, automatic charge, retainer, setup fee, or monthly minimum.
Get Started
Tell us your brand and which products matter. We handle the analysis, the case work, and the follow-up, and you pay only when Amazon confirms a removal.
500 written negative reviews required · US marketplace · Amazon makes the final decision